Virginia Immigration Lawyers

Virginia Lawyers Immigration Deportation Asylum Evidence

If you are facing immigration case in Virginia, contact our law firm for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Thomas v. United States

Facts:

Petitioner alien sought review of an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals that denied petitioner's applications for asylum and withholding of deportation, and in the alternative, for voluntary departure.
If you are facing a Immigration case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

• • In deportation proceedings, an appellate court reviews credibility and factual findings under the substantial evidence standard but subject mixed questions of law and fact to de novo review. It reviews the Board of Immigration Appeal's decision on a request for withholding of deportation under the substantial evidence standard. The appellate court reviews the denial of voluntary departure for an abuse of discretion.
• • An applicant for asylum establishes a well-founded fear if he shows that a reasonable person in his circumstances would fear persecution.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Immigration Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.


These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.